Shareholders Agreement Attorneys In Sandton

Shareholders’ Agreements, Deadlock Clauses and Founder Exits

Two founders who split a Sandton company 50/50 with no deadlock clause can paralyse the business entirely, no resolutions, no dividends, no exit, until someone applies to the High Court, while a shareholder leaving without a valuation formula or tag-along right discovers that the shares are worth whatever the majority says they are.

Our commercial team drafts and renegotiates shareholders’ agreements from the Sandton office, in Africa’s corporate hub, for founder teams, family businesses and investor groups across the district’s SME economy.

  • Litigation Law Lawyer Of The Year 2024
  • Best Criminal Law Practice 2025
  • Lawyer of the Year 2025
  • Legal Practice Council
Case Intake – Confidential

Book a Consultation

A member of the Otrebski team will respond soon

  • Litigation Law Lawyer Of The Year 2024
  • Best Criminal Law Practice 2025
  • Lawyer of the Year 2025
  • Legal Practice Council

Why Shareholders’ Agreements Are Signed in Friendship and Read in Dispute

The agreement exists for the day the founders disagree. That day always comes.

Every Sandton shareholders’ agreement runs through the same clauses:

  • board and shareholder reserved matters
  • deadlock resolution
  • share valuation on exit
  • tag-along and drag-along
  • pre-emptive rights on new issues
  • good and bad leaver treatment

The Companies Act 71 of 2008 fixes only the floor: the MOI governs the company’s structures, class rights and meeting rules, and certain shareholder remedies such as oppression relief under section 163 sit behind every dispute. Everything else, who decides what, how shares are valued when someone leaves, and what happens when votes split, lives in the shareholders’ agreement, which binds only the parties who sign it.

The standard failure is structural: a shareholders’ agreement that contradicts the MOI, or share transfers that happen without the agreement being signed by the new shareholder. An agreement that binds only yesterday’s parties governs nobody once the dispute arrives, and section 163 litigation is the expensive substitute for the deadlock clause nobody drafted.

What a Shareholders’ Agreement Attorney Does

Structure first: share classes, board composition and reserved matters matched to who the founders actually are. Then the agreement: deadlock mechanics, valuation formulae for exits, tag- and drag-along rights, pre-emptive rights, restraints and leaver provisions, each aligned with the MOI so the two documents never fight.

In dispute: enforcing the agreement’s own mechanisms before they are abandoned, and where the relationship is beyond repair, structuring exits, buyouts and, where justified, section 163 oppression applications with the valuation run properly.

A deadlock clause is agreed in an hour of goodwill or litigated over two years without one.

Shareholders’ Agreement vs MOI

Memorandum of Incorporation

The company’s constitutional document, filed with the CIPC, binding the company, its board and every shareholder whether they signed or not.

It carries what must be public and enforceable against all: share classes and rights, structures, meeting and voting rules, and the statutory reserved matters.

Shareholders’ Agreement

A private contract between the shareholders, binding only its signatories, enforceable by the parties against each other.

It carries what founders would rather not publish: valuation formulae, leaver terms, restraints, deadlock mechanics and dividend understandings.

DimensionMOIShareholders’ Agreement
Who it bindsCompany, board and all shareholdersSignatory shareholders only
PublicityFiled at the CIPC, public recordPrivate between the parties
Best forShare classes, structures, voting rulesExits, valuation, deadlock, restraints
Change processSpecial resolution and CIPC filingContractual amendment, all parties
On a new shareholderBinds automaticallyMust be acceded to in writing
The Procedure

The Pathway, Step by Step

From founder conversation to an agreement that holds.

  1. Scoping

    The shareholding, roles, ambitions and exit expectations of each founder are mapped, and the fee quote follows the complexity.

  2. Structure review

    Share classes, the MOI and the company’s actual decision-making are checked, so the agreement is built on the company as it really is.

  3. Drafting

    The agreement is drafted: reserved matters, deadlock mechanics, valuation on exit, tag- and drag-along, pre-emptive rights, leaver terms and restraints.

  4. Negotiation

    Each founder’s position is negotiated openly, with counsel identifying what each clause means on the worst day, not the best.

  5. MOI alignment and signature

    The MOI is amended where the agreement needs it, every shareholder signs, and new shareholders accede in writing as a standing condition.

  6. Review as the company changes

    Funding rounds, new classes of shares and changed control trigger a review, because an outdated agreement governs a company that no longer exists.

Which Courts Serve Sandton Clients

Sandton commercial matters run through the Johannesburg machinery:

  • High Court, Gauteng Division – commercial litigation, contract disputes and company matters.
  • Companies Tribunal – expedited relief in certain company and shareholder matters, alongside oppression applications in the High Court.
  • Magistrates’ and Regional Courts – smaller commercial claims within jurisdiction.

Otrebski Attorneys practises from 5th Street, Sandhurst – in the district it serves.

How to Choose a Shareholders’ Agreement Attorney in Sandton

Your agreement has to hold on a bad day. Choose on evidence.

  • Both drafting and dispute experience.A lawyer who has run founder disputes knows precisely which clauses fail, and drafts accordingly.
  • Independence across founders.Ask who the client is. In a two-founder deal, joint instruction with the conflict managed, or separate counsel, keeps the agreement valid and trusted.
  • Deadlock fluency.Ask them to walk through what happens on a 50/50 vote split. A concrete mechanism, not a shrug, is the credential.
  • MOI discipline.The agreement must align with the MOI, and new shareholders must accede. Lawyers who skip both produce paper that governs nobody.
  • Verifiable standing.Confirm the firm and its attorneys through the Legal Practice Council register.

What Shareholders’ Agreements Cost

As a market guide, a shareholders’ agreement for a founder-owned company commonly runs R12,000–R45,000 depending on the number of parties and the complexity of exit and deadlock mechanics; multi-party and investor agreements are typically higher, and negotiation is commonly hourly at R1,800–R4,500.

Quotes exclude CIPC fees on any MOI amendments, valuer and auditor fees, and counsel in disputes. Otrebski Attorneys scopes the mandate in writing before work begins. No hidden costs.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

The expensive shareholder mistakes are avoidable.

Running 50/50 with no deadlock clause.An even split with no mechanism means one disagreement can paralyse the company, and the remedy becomes High Court litigation nobody wanted.
Copying a template agreement.A downloaded agreement carries another company’s share classes, valuation ideas and assumptions, and its clauses fail on the facts of your business precisely when invoked.
No valuation mechanism on exit.When a founder leaves, the price of the shares is the whole dispute. A formula, a valuer protocol or a staged mechanism, fixed in advance, is worth more than any goodwill.
Letting the agreement contradict the MOI.Where the two documents conflict, the MOI binds the company and the confusion is litigated at cost. Alignment is drafting hygiene, not a luxury.
New shareholders never acceding.The agreement binds signatories only. A share transfer without written accession leaves the new shareholder outside the framework, and the framework broken.
No leaver or restraint provisions.A founder who exits badly can compete and recruit while holding shares. Good and bad leaver pricing and a scoped restraint are what keep the exit civil.

The Clauses That Do the Work

What each mechanism settles

  • Deadlock clause – sets in an hour of goodwill what is otherwise litigated over two years: the mechanism for a vote that splits down the middle.
  • Valuation on exit – fixes the price of the shares when a founder leaves, by formula, valuer protocol or staged mechanism agreed in advance.
  • Tag-along right – lets minority shareholders join a majority sale on the same terms, so a controlling holder cannot sell and leave them behind.
  • Drag-along right – lets a majority who has secured a sale compel minorities to sell on the same terms, so a small holder cannot hold up the deal.
  • Pre-emptive rights – govern new issues of shares, protecting existing holders’ proportions when the company raises money.
  • Good and bad leaver terms – price a founder’s exit according to how they leave, paired with a scoped restraint to keep the exit civil.

Frequently Asked Questions

My co-founder and I cannot agree and we are deadlocked. What can we do?

Check the shareholders’ agreement and MOI first: many contain deadlock mechanics, casting votes, buy-out shots or mediation triggers, that resolve the standstill without court. If nothing exists, the options narrow to negotiated buyouts or High Court relief, including liquidation or oppression applications, which is why the clause should have been drafted before the dispute.

Is a shareholders’ agreement legally binding in South Africa?

Yes, as a contract between the shareholders who sign it. It binds those parties, not the company itself, which is why it must work alongside the MOI and why every new shareholder must accede to it in writing.

What is the difference between a shareholders’ agreement and an MOI?

The MOI is the company’s constitutional document filed with the CIPC, binding the company, the board and all shareholders. The shareholders’ agreement is a private contract binding only its signatories, and it is where valuation, deadlock, leaver and restraint terms usually live.

What are tag-along and drag-along rights?

Tag-along lets minority shareholders join a majority sale on the same terms, so a controlling shareholder cannot sell the company and leave them behind. Drag-along lets a majority who has secured a sale compel minorities to sell on the same terms, so a small holder cannot block or hold up the deal.

Can a shareholder be forced to sell their shares?

Only if they agreed to be: drag-along and leaver clauses, validly concluded and properly scoped, can compel a sale on the stated terms. Otherwise a shareholder keeps the shares, and a buyout needs consent or court-ordered relief in oppression-type cases.

Where do Sandton shareholder disputes get heard?

Oppression and deadlock matters go to the High Court, Gauteng Division, with the Companies Tribunal handling certain expedited company relief, and many agreements route disputes to arbitration or mediation first. Sandton’s SME density makes the Gauteng Division a busy venue for founder disputes.

Do family businesses in Sandton need shareholders’ agreements?

Especially those. Family shareholdings drift across generations, and agreements drafted when everyone trusted each other are what keep a shareholding dispute out of the family and out of court when relationships change.

What does a shareholders’ agreement cost?

As a market guide, founder-level agreements commonly run R12,000–R45,000, quoted in writing before drafting begins, rising with the number of parties and the complexity of the exit mechanics.

5.0/5
Level 4 B-BBEE Contributor
100% Women-Led Firm
Speak To Us

Speak to a specialist.

Otrebski Attorneys practises from Office 9th Floor, The Spaces, 5th Street, Sandhurst, Sandton – with transparent billing and no hidden costs.

Call 060 500 3098
Office hours: Monday to Friday, 08h00 – 17h00 · send a message

Image credits: Eternal Flame, Constitution Hill – Mihi tr via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0; Johannesburg skyline – Khaanya96 via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0; Mandela Bridge, Braamfontein – South African Tourism via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0.