Child Custody Attorneys In Sandton

Care, Contact and Primary Residence Under the Children’s Act

People search for custody. The courts decide care, contact and primary residence – and the parent who arrives with the Children’s Act properly applied, and the child’s real routine documented, usually leaves with the order that matters.

Our Sandton family practice drafts, negotiates and litigates care and contact arrangements under the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 for parents across Sandton and the northern suburbs, from our Sandhurst offices.

  • Litigation Law Lawyer Of The Year 2024
  • Best Criminal Law Practice 2025
  • Lawyer of the Year 2025
  • Legal Practice Council
Case Intake – Confidential

Book a Consultation

A member of the Otrebski team will respond soon

  • Litigation Law Lawyer Of The Year 2024
  • Best Criminal Law Practice 2025
  • Lawyer of the Year 2025
  • Legal Practice Council

Custody Is the Search Word. Care and Contact Are the Law.

“Custody” no longer exists as a legal term. Since the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 came into force, disputes are about parental responsibilities and rights.

A Sandton custody dispute is really a dispute about these components:

  • care (where the child lives day to day)
  • contact (when the other parent sees the child)
  • guardianship (major decisions, passports, contracts)
  • primary residence
  • specific and court-ordered contact schedules
  • relocation out of Gauteng or abroad

Sections 18 to 23 of the Children’s Act set out who holds parental responsibilities and rights, and section 7 lists the best-interests factors the court must weigh. Neither parent is preferred by the Act: the inquiry is the child’s best interests, proved on evidence – schooling, stability, each parent’s availability, the child’s views where age-appropriate.

Most disputes are won on paper before they are won in court: a documented routine, school reports, a proposed contact schedule that actually works logistically. Parents who arrive with proposals rather than grievances settle faster and comply longer.

What a Custody Attorney Does

Advises on rights under sections 18 to 23, drafts parenting plans and contact schedules, negotiates primary residence, and brings or opposes urgent applications where a child is being withheld.

Where relocation is in issue, prepares the best-interests case the Act demands: reasons, alternatives, and a workable contact proposal for the left-behind parent.

The court does not ask which parent loves the child more. It asks which arrangement serves the child’s best interests – on evidence.

Primary Residence vs Contact: The Real Fork

Primary Residence (What People Call Custody)

The order stating with which parent the child primarily lives, granted under the Children’s Act after a best-interests inquiry.

Contested hearings turn on stability, schooling, each parent’s involvement and, where old enough, the child’s own view.

Contact (What People Call Access)

The other parent’s right to maintain a relationship: visits, weekends, holidays, telephone and video contact.

Courts start from the position that contact with both parents serves the child, and restrict it only for good reason – never as a punishment of the other parent.

IssuePrimary ResidenceContact
What it decidesWith whom the child mainly livesHow and when the other parent sees the child
Typical disputeRelocation, schooling, parental fitnessWithholding of visits, interference, scheduling
Court’s starting pointBest interests after a section 7 inquiryContact with both parents unless unsafe
Urgency routeRule-breaking rarely urgent; interim residence possibleUrgent enforcement where contact is being blocked
The Procedure

The Process, Step by Step

The pathway from dispute to enforceable order.

  1. Consultation and rights assessment

    The attorney maps your parental responsibilities and rights under sections 18 to 23 and the practical dispute behind them.

  2. Attempt at agreement

    A parenting plan or contact schedule is negotiated, usually with the assistance of a social worker or family advocate where required.

  3. Mediation or family advocate process

    Most care and contact disputes must attempt mediation; the Family Advocate evaluates the child’s best interests in contested proceedings.

  4. Application to the children’s court or High Court

    If agreement fails, a care and contact application is launched, with an interim arrangement sought where the child’s stability demands it.

  5. Best-interests evidence

    Schooling, routines, reports and, where appropriate, the child’s views are placed before the court.

  6. Order and enforcement

    A final order is granted; breaches are enforced through the court, including urgent applications where contact is withheld.

Which Courts Serve Sandton Clients

Sandton matters run through the Johannesburg North machinery:

  • Randburg Regional Court – the primary district seat for Sandton family matters.
  • Randburg and Johannesburg Children’s Courts – care, contact and guardianship applications for the district.
  • High Court, Gauteng Division – complex or high-value matters.

Otrebski Attorneys practises from 5th Street, Sandhurst – in the district it serves.

How to Choose a Custody Attorney in Sandton

This order shapes your child’s childhood. Choose on evidence.

  • Children’s Act fluency.Ask how they apply the section 7 best-interests factors to your facts, in terms, not in generalities.
  • Settlement-first instincts.A lawyer who litigates before attempting a workable parenting plan costs you money and goodwill.
  • Family Advocate experience.Contested matters pass through that office; experience there shortens the road.
  • Relocation experience if relevant.Removal applications are a distinct craft: ask for the approach to alternatives and continued contact.
  • Honest probability talk.No ethical attorney promises a residential outcome. They prepare the best-interests case.

What Custody Work Costs

As a market guide, a negotiated parenting plan commonly runs R8,000–R25,000; opposed care and contact proceedings R40,000–R150,000 depending on the number of hearings and expert reports, on hourly rates of R1,500–R4,400. Excluded unless agreed: social worker and psychological experts, Family Advocate processes and counsel’s fees, quoted separately.

Otrebski Attorneys scopes each phase in writing before work begins. Clients come before billable hours. No hidden costs.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

The expensive mistakes are avoidable.

Withholding contact to gain the upper hand.Courts read blocked contact as a best-interests failure by the blocking parent, and it routinely backfires at the residence hearing.
Treating the child as a messenger.Parental alienation evidence has decided residence disputes; keep the child out of the conflict entirely.
Moving the child before the order.Unilateral relocation is viewed dimly and often undone; it also invites an urgent application against you.
Litigating grievances, not arrangements.The court wants a workable plan, not a verdict on the marriage. Grievance-driven cases lose and cost more.
Skipping mediation.It is usually required and often works; refusing it wastes costs the court may later not award you.
Acting on WhatsApp custody ‘orders’.Informal agreements are unenforceable when they matter. Get the arrangement made an order of court.

When Contact Is Being Withheld

The Sequence That Protects You

  • Document every refusal – dates, messages and witnesses for each refused visit; the enforcement case runs on that record.
  • Move urgently – an urgent application can enforce contact where it is being blocked.
  • Stabilise the routine – interim arrangements can be sought at the outset while the main application proceeds.
  • Let the refusal count – blocked contact reads as a best-interests failure by the blocking parent.
  • Do not retaliate – withholding contact in return routinely backfires at the residence hearing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does ‘custody’ still exist in South African law?

No. Since the Children’s Act 38 of 2005, the terms are care, contact, guardianship and primary residence. ‘Custody’ survives as the everyday search word – the court will decide care and contact.

At what age can my child choose which parent to live with?

There is no fixed age. The court weighs the child’s views under the section 7 best-interests factors, giving them more weight with maturity; a child of roughly 12 and up is usually heard through the Family Advocate.

The other parent won’t let me see my child. What now?

You can bring an urgent application to enforce contact. Document every refused visit first – dates, messages, witnesses – because the enforcement case runs on that record.

Can my ex move with my child to another province?

Not unilaterally. Relocation is a best-interests question: the relocating parent must justify the move and show how contact with you will be preserved. Oppose it early, not after the move.

Will the mother automatically get the child?

No. The Children’s Act contains no maternal preference. Fathers with parental responsibilities and rights, whether by marriage, living with the child or agreement, stand equal before the best-interests inquiry.

Which courts hear Sandton custody matters?

Care and contact applications for Sandton families run through the Randburg and Johannesburg Children’s Courts and the Family Advocate’s office, with complex matters in the Gauteng Division of the High Court.

How long does an opposed custody case take in Sandton?

A contested care and contact matter commonly runs six to eighteen months through the Johannesburg North courts, longer where expert reports are directed. Interim arrangements can be sought at the outset to stabilise the child’s routine.

5.0/5
Level 4 B-BBEE Contributor
100% Women-Led Firm
Speak To Us

Speak to a specialist.

Otrebski Attorneys practises from Office 9th Floor, The Spaces, 5th Street, Sandhurst, Sandton – with transparent billing and no hidden costs.

Call 060 500 3098
Office hours: Monday to Friday, 08h00 – 17h00 · send a message

Image credits: Eternal Flame, Constitution Hill – Mihi tr via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0; Johannesburg skyline – Khaanya96 via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0; Mandela Bridge, Braamfontein – South African Tourism via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0.