Not every bail question in a South African criminal court is decided on the spot at the first appearance. Where the charges are serious, or where the accused intends to call witnesses and lead detailed evidence, the matter moves out of the informal bail process and into a formal bail application under section 60 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977.
A formal bail application is a structured court hearing in which the accused places admissible evidence before a magistrate or judge and asks the court to find that the interests of justice permit release pending trial. Unlike informal bail, where the accused simply addresses the court from the dock, the formal procedure involves written notice, affidavits, oral evidence, cross-examination and legal argument.
Informal Bail Versus Formal Bail
Section 59 of the Criminal Procedure Act governs bail at the first court appearance, often called informal or section 59 bail. The accused, or a legal representative on instruction, addresses the court from the dock, the prosecutor indicates whether the State opposes, and the magistrate applies the interests of justice test. No witness is sworn in and no affidavits are handed up.
A formal bail application under section 60 is different in kind. The accused intends to lead evidence on oath, usually by testifying from the witness box and calling supporting witnesses such as a surety, employer or family member. Because the accused is bringing evidence, the procedural safeguards in section 60(11), section 60(11A) and section 60(11B) come into play to ensure the State is not ambushed and the hearing remains fair.
The Section 60(11A) Notice to the State
The single feature that most clearly distinguishes a formal bail application is the notice that the accused must give to the prosecution. Section 60(11A) of the Act provides that, where the accused intends to lead evidence other than his or her own oral evidence, the accused must give the prosecutor written notice before the proceedings begin. In practice this is done at least one court day before the hearing.
The notice sets out the names of the witnesses the accused intends to call and a summary of the evidence each will give. It allows the investigating officer to verify addresses, employment and previous convictions, and allows the prosecutor to take proper instructions on whether to oppose. The courts have repeatedly emphasised that this notice is not a technicality; it is central to the integrity of the bail hearing.
The Affidavit Under Section 60(11)
Section 60(11) of the Act requires the accused to hand to the prosecutor a copy of any statement or affidavit on which the defence intends to rely. Where the accused is the only witness, the affidavit will set out the personal circumstances placed before the court: residential address, employment, family responsibilities, dependants, ties to the area, previous convictions and the accused’s version of the strength of the State’s case.
Section 60(11B) goes further and allows the accused, or any other witness, to submit an affidavit as evidence in chief unless the prosecutor objects. Where the prosecutor does object, the witness must give oral evidence and be available for cross-examination. The strategic choice between affidavit evidence and oral testimony is one of the reasons an experienced defence attorney is so important in a formal application.
Leading Evidence and Cross-Examination
Once the formalities of notice and disclosure are complete, the hearing begins. In an ordinary (non-Schedule 5 or 6) matter the State bears the burden of showing why release would not be in the interests of justice, but in practice the accused usually leads evidence first to place personal circumstances before the court. Where a Schedule 5 or Schedule 6 reverse onus applies, the accused must adduce evidence satisfying the court that release is justified.
The accused testifies under oath and may call supporting witnesses. The prosecutor is entitled to cross-examine each witness, including the accused, on address, ties to the community, previous convictions and any matter relevant to the interests of justice test in section 60(4). The court then hears any evidence the State wishes to lead, most commonly that of the investigating officer, who will place the State’s version of the strength of its case before the court.
How the State Opposes a Formal Application
Where the State opposes bail it does so on one or more of the grounds set out in section 60(4). The prosecutor must do more than simply announce opposition. The leading authority, S v Matshona, requires the State to place its essential allegations in dispute by way of evidence from the investigating officer, so that the defence knows the case it has to meet.
- That the accused is likely to evade trial if released.
- That the accused is likely to interfere with witnesses or destroy evidence.
- That the accused is likely to commit a further offence while on bail.
- That release would endanger a particular person or the wider community.
- That the administration of justice would be undermined by release.
The prosecutor’s address will tie these grounds to the evidence led, while the defence will answer with the accused’s personal circumstances, the strength or weakness of the State’s case, and any factor that reduces the risk identified by the State.
Argument and the Court’s Ruling
After evidence closes both sides address the court. The defence will argue that the interests of justice permit release, applying the section 60(4) factors to the evidence led, and will deal with the question of a reverse onus where Schedule 5 or Schedule 6 is engaged. The State will argue that one or more of the grounds for refusal has been established, or that the accused has failed to discharge a reverse onus.
The magistrate or judge then weighs the evidence and delivers a ruling. If bail is refused, the court must give reasons so that the accused can consider an appeal, a review, or a fresh application on new facts under section 60(8). If bail is granted, the court almost always attaches conditions tailored to the risks identified during the hearing.
Conditions the Court May Impose
- Reporting to a specified police station on fixed days.
- Surrender of a passport and a bar on applying for a new one.
- A surety, fixed-property guarantee or cash deposit.
- Restrictions on contacting complainants, witnesses or co-accused.
- A curfew, house arrest, or in serious cases electronic monitoring.
Breach of a bail condition is a criminal offence under section 67 of the Act and can lead to cancellation of bail and the accused being returned to custody. Conditions should therefore be framed so that the accused can realistically comply with them for the entire period until trial.
Why Legal Representation Matters in a Formal Hearing
The notice requirements, the affidavit rules and the order in which evidence must be led make a formal bail application a technical proceeding. A defence attorney who understands section 60 can identify whether a reverse onus applies, prepare the accused and sureties for cross-examination, anticipate the investigating officer’s evidence, and structure the legal argument around the section 60(4) factors.
The Criminal Law department at Otrebski Attorneys regularly conducts formal bail applications in courts across Gauteng. As a 100% women-led, Level 4 B-BBEE firm with a single Sandton office, the firm brings focused, evidence-based advocacy to bail hearings where liberty is at stake. The firm is rated five stars across twelve reviews and is led by Director Nastasja Otrebski, who personally oversees the criminal law practice.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a formal bail application in South Africa?
A formal bail application is a court hearing under section 60 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 in which the accused leads evidence on oath, with prior written notice to the State, supporting affidavits and witnesses, and legal argument on whether the interests of justice permit release.
What is the section 60(11A) notice?
Section 60(11A) requires the accused to give the prosecutor written notice, before the hearing, of the witnesses the accused intends to call and the substance of their evidence. It is designed to prevent the State from being ambushed and to allow the investigating officer to verify the accused’s personal circumstances.
Does the accused have to hand over an affidavit?
Yes. Under section 60(11) the accused must hand the prosecutor a copy of any statement or affidavit relied on, and under section 60(11B) the accused or any other witness may submit an affidavit as evidence in chief unless the prosecutor objects and requires oral testimony.
Can the prosecutor cross-examine the accused in a formal bail hearing?
Yes. Once the accused or any defence witness testifies on oath, the prosecutor is entitled to cross-examine on residential address, employment, previous convictions, ties to the area and any matter relevant to the interests of justice test in section 60(4) of the Act.
What happens if a formal bail application is refused?
Where bail is refused the court must give reasons. The accused may then appeal or review the refusal in appropriate circumstances, or bring a fresh application under section 60(8) on new facts. Legal advice should be obtained quickly because time limits apply to appeals.
Get help with a criminal law matter.
Disclaimer. This article is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Bail outcomes depend on the specific facts of each matter, and no attorney can guarantee a particular result. You should consult a qualified legal practitioner about your circumstances before acting on anything contained here.